Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Soto

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1991No. 08-91-00057-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOEHLER, Justice.

In the trial of a workers’ compensation case, the jury found total and permanent incapacity. In this appeal from the judgment rendered on the verdict, the compensation carrier claims insufficient evidence to support the verdict and improper jury argument as grounds for reversal. We reverse and remand.

In its first point of error, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Appellant, asserts factually insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of total and permanent incapacity. When a factual sufficiency challenge is brought, the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Clancy v. Zale Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Mandril v. KasishkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Williamson, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998
  2. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., LP v. Boutte, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  3. Quiroz ex rel. Cardona v. Llamas-SoforoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Grey Wolf Drilling Company, L.P. v. Denfer Boutte, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. James David Harrison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API