Legal Opinion

Mandril v. Kasishke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 31, 1981No. 9268PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DODSON, Justice.

A. T. Mandril brought this action against Coraldale Kasishke for alleged breaches of two contracts between the parties. In his action, Mr. Mandril alleged that Mrs. Ka-sishke overcharged him for gasoline and diesel fuel purchased under the agreements. Mrs. Kasishke generally denied Mr. Mandril’s allegations and alleged several affirmative defenses such as voluntary payment, laches, estoppel, waiver, modification, breach of contract, setoff and voidness. The case was tried with a jury. Based on the jury’s answers to certain special issues, the trial court rendered a…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Mead v. Johnson Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hathaway v. General Mills, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  4. Beavers v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  5. E. D. Systems Corporation v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API