Legal Opinion

Bickley Clothing Co. v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoKE, J.

Plaintiffs, thirty-two or thirty-three in number, separate creditors of the Watauga Supply Company, for themselves and all other creditors, etc., have instituted the present action in the nature of a bill in equity to realize on the assets of said company in their favor, “individually and collectively,” and it is alleged, among other things, that the Watauga Supply Company is insolvent, and J. S. McBride, made .a defendant, has in some proceedings, the nature of which is not definitely stated, been appointed and is now receiver of the company.

For causes of action the complaint, after stating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Thigpen v. Kinston Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Cromartie v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Burleson v. . BurlesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. In Re BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Rogers v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API