Legal Opinion

Rogers v. . Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdaMs, J.

Tbe plaintiffs instituted a proceeding before the clerk to establish a disputed boundary line as provided in C. S., 9. They filed their petition, the defendant filed an answer, and the cause was put on 'the civil docket for trial in term. Thereafter the plaintiffs filed an amendment to their complaint and the defendant demurred. The demurrer was overruled and the defendant excepted. In the amended complaint it is alleged: 1. That a part of the controversy relates to the dividing line between the lot numbered 19 and the two lots numbered 24 and 26; that T. P. Eogers has a life estate in No. 24…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Thigpen v. Kinston Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Weaver v. . KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Campbell v. Washington Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. GULF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Greene v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API