Legal Opinion

State v. Buckner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1997No. 62043-1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— We granted the State’s motion for reconsideration to consider whether we should adhere to our original holdings in this case following our decisions in other cases involving admissibility of DNA evidence and the recent publication of a national report addressing *65statistical issues involving DNA evidence. In light of these recent developments, we conclude that our original opinion is no longer sound. Upon reconsideration, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals upholding Curtis S. Buckner’s conviction for first degree felony murder.

The facts are recounted in our original opinion,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. MatteiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. State v. AsaeliCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API