Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mattei

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 2010No. SJC-10390PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review to consider his claim that the trial judge committed reversible error by admitting expert testimony that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) tests could not exclude the defendant as the source of DNA taken from the scene of the crime without accompanying testimony explaining the statistical import of those results. The defendant also claims that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of home invasion and assault by means of a dangerous weapon because the duct tape used in the attack was not a “dangerous weapon” 2 ; that his…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Watts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. Pytou HeangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. LintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Duncan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API