Legal Opinion
Goerig v. Continental Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1948No. Nos. 11722-11726PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
These five appeals, each having identical issues, were briefed and argued together. Each suit was brought against the Continental Casualty Company, hereafter called Continental, under the Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793 et seq., 40 U.S.C. 270a, 270b, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a, 270b, by the United States as use plaintiff for a subcontractor supplying labor or materials on government construction contracts made by a group of joint adventurers, of which the district court held appellants were members. In all, judgments were given against Continental on its bonds for the performance of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Haines v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Crane Co. v. StokkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Town of Flagstaff v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Southern Surety Co. v. PlottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- PCI/RCI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Sitchenko v. DiRestaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.