Legal Opinion

Town of Flagstaff v. Walsh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1925No. 4580PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCAMANT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

It is alleged in the complaint, with reference to the Gomez Case, “that the said McLean & Walsh, by their attorneys, assumed .tthe control and-direction of the trial of said cause; that the plaintiff herein advised tho said McLean & Walsh and tho court, before the trial of said cause, that the town of Flagstaff held an indemnity bond from the said McLean & Walsh as against any damages that might be recovered against said town in said cause-, and that the town of Flagstaff desired only to protect the rights of the indemnitors; that said trial was conducted on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wiggin v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HaggartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Boston & Maine Railroad v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  5. Westfield Gas & Milling Co. v. Noblesville & Eagletown Gravel Road Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. StapfSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Jackson v. Florida WeathermakersSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. The No. 34.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. Trushcheff v. Abell-Howe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. City of Mobile v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API