State v. Perry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The defendant contends that the testimony of C. L. Collins, a bail bondsman, concerning statements made by the defendant should have been suppressed. Defendant argues that his statements were made after he was taken into custody by Collins and that Miranda warnings were not given. Defendant further argues that because his extrajudicial statements were not made voluntarily and knowingly, but were made during an improper interrogation, they should have been suppressed. We do not agree with defendant’s contentions.
On voir dire, the trial judge found that, while a warrant had been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. . LingerfeltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.