Legal Opinion

State v. Mathis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1998No. 10PA98Published

1Opinion of the Court

509 S.E.2d 155 (1998)

349 N.C. 503

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Charles Timothy MATHIS and Barak Elliot Williamson.

No. 10PA98.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 31, 1998.

Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Ellen B. Scouten, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Aaron E. Michel, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees.

MITCHELL, Chief Justice.

The questions presented for review by the State's petition for writ of certiorari involve whether the Court of Appeals, in ordering a new trial, improperly construed the common law powers of bail bondsmen to allow them to break into a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Read v. CaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API