Legal Opinion

State v. Mathis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1997No. COA96-1312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendants appeal criminal convictions of breaking and entering, assault on a female, and injury to real property. Evidence presented at trial tended to show that defendants are licensed bail bondsmen. On 9 December 1995, defendant Mathis received instructions from his employer to find and arrest William Tankersly III because he had “skipped bail.”

Defendants drove to the residence of Tankersly’s mother where Tankersly lived. Tankersly’s sister answered the door. She told defendants that her brother and mother had left about twenty minutes before in a white Mazda. Later that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. State v. CornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. FerdinandoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Perry v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. LyonNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1998
  4. State v. GettlemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API