Legal Opinion
CYPRESS SECURITY, LLC v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 2010No. A122534PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Cypress Security, LLC (Cypress), former provider of security services for the San Francisco Department of Human Services (DHS), lost to competitor Guardsmark, LLC (Guardsmark), in contract proceedings initiated by DHS through a request for proposals (RFP). Cypress sought mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) against the City and County of San Francisco (City), DHS, and Guardsmark to have the award to Guardsmark set aside. The court denied relief, and Cypress appeals. 1 We affirm.
Background
RFP Process and Award
The process, under chapter 21 of the San Francisco Administrative…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Nelson v. GauntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great West Contractors, Inc. v. Irvine Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- EEL River Disposal & Resource Recovery Inc. v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Schiff v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011