Legal Opinion
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Herder
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1988No. CV-87-0081-PRPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioner, Charles Herder (Herder), seeks review of a court of appeals’ opinion holding that, under A.R.S. § 20-673, Herder’s recovery from his host driver’s insurance carrier effectively offset and reduced the limits of coverage provided by cross-petitioner, the Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund (Fund). We granted review to examine and interpret the statute. Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The operative facts are undisputed. Herder was a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. KarstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Allied Mutual Insurance Company v. LarrivaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Bell v. SlezakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Union Carbide Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.