Legal Opinion
City of Guymon v. Butler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 25, 2004No. 98,766PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
T1 The issue is whether the appellants 2 (the County) properly withheld an ad valo-rem tax increment from the appellees, the City of Guymon and Guymon Industrial Authority (the City). The County asserts that the Guymon-Seaboard Economic Development Project, established by ordinances enacted by the City of Guymon, violates provisions of the Constitution of Oklahoma, and the Local Development Act (62 0.8.2001, §§ 850-880) 3 and therefore it properly withheld the payment. The district court found for the City and the County appeals. We affirm.
I. PROCEDURE
T2 On May 31, 2002, the City sued the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Cowart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Burkhardt v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harvey v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- In Re Application of Oklahoma Development Finance Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Opinion No., Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.