Legal Opinion
People v. Ivester
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1991No. Docket Nos. D009731, D013585PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
—Defendant Donald Ivester agreed to plead guilty to unlawfully manufacturing methamphetamine in excess of one pound (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a)) and endangering a child (Pen. Code, § 273a) 1 in exchange for the district attorney dismissing two additional felonies with which he was charged. In this appeal from the judgment he contends his guilty pleas were unknowingly and involuntarily made. In his consolidated petition for writ of habeas corpus he seeks relief on a similar ground asserting his pleas were induced by his counsel’s inaccurate statement…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. VoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. ManriquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- State of Iowa v. David J. TreptowSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.