Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2004No. S102965PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

There are two types of guilty or no contest pleas in California: (1) a conditional plea, where the plea is conditioned upon receipt of a particular disposition; and (2) an unconditional or open plea. (People v. Hoffard (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1170, 1181 [43 Cal.Rptr.2d 827, 899 P.2d 896].) When taking a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendere (hereafter no contest) to an accusatory pleading charging a felony, a trial court is required by Penal Code section 1192.5 1 to “cause an inquiry to be made of the defendant to satisfy itself that the plea is freely and voluntarily made,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  5. In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. People v. VoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. R.V.California Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API