Legal Opinion

In re McGann

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2004No. 01-BG-1577Published

1Per curiam

On September 18, 2001, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board imposed a *865public reprimand upon the respondent,1 along with the condition that he take certain continuing education courses, after finding that he had represented multiple criminal defendants facing prosecution arising out of the same matter, even though the clients’ interests were in conflict. When respondent did not immediately comply with the conditions, he was temporarily suspended by Virginia. After he complied, he was reinstated and no further action was taken by Virginia.

Bar Counsel notified us of this action, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Matter of McGannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. In Re ButterfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API