In re Gabapentin Patent Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
CHESLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion by the MDL Defendants, (hereinafter “Defendants”) to Compel Production of Documents which, they claim, are being improp*180erly withheld by the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs Pfizer, Inc., Warner-Lambert Company, and Godecke Aktiengesselschaft (collectively ‘Warner-Lambert”) have opposed this motion, arguing that the documents at issue are properly withheld pursuant to the attorney-client privilege, the work product privilege, and in some cases, both. This Court has reviewed the written submissions of both parties and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Sealed Air Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Anaya v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.