Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Sealed Air Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FALK, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System’s (“Plaintiff’ or “MPERS”) motion to compel the production of documents. Defendants Sealed Air Corporation and T.J. Dermot Dunphy (collectively, “Defendants” or “Sealed Air”) have opposed the motion. The motion is decided on the papers submitted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); L.Civ.R. 37.1(b)(4). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This is a class action for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bridgewater v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Glenn Hedden v. Kean UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Memory Bowl v. North Pointe InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Serrano v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.