Legal Opinion
Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. Tumbleson
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided January 20, 1995No. A94-184 CV (JKS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER FROM CHAMBERS
SINGLETON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action for declaratory judgment in which Colonial Insurance Company of California (“Colonial”) seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to pay the claims of Derek Tumbleson and his family (“Tumblesons”) under the uninsured/underinsured (“UM/UIM”) coverage in the auto insurance policy which Colonial issued to the Tumble-sons. Both parties have moved for summary judgment and each argues that there are no disputed issues of material fact. Docket Nos. 3 and 5. The parties also argue that the remaining issues are legal…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Colonial Insurance v. TumblesonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1995