Legal Opinion

Colonial Insurance v. Tumbleson

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 7, 1995No. A94-184 CV (JKS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FROM CHAMBERS

(Reconsideration)

SINGLETON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action for declaratory judgment, Colonial Insurance Company of California (“Colonial”) seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to pay the claims of Derek Tumble-son and his family (“Tumblesons”) under the uninsured/underinsured (“UM/UIM”) coverage of the auto insurance issued to them by Colonial. Both parties moved for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 3 & 5) and the Court issued a decision in favor of Plaintiff, declaring that the Tumbleson’s cannot recover under the UIM policy issued by Colonial. Docket…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API