Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Household Life Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2011No. 36746PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a claim for life insurance proceeds. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Household Life Insurance Company (HLIC) on the grounds that Alan Rogers’ life insurance contract was void because he was adjudicated incompetent before he entered the contract. Alan’s son and guardian, Jason Rogers, argues that the contract was merely voidable, that as Alan’s guardian he had the capacity to and did ratify the contract, and that the contract was thus enforceable. We affirm, but deny HLIC’s request for attorney fees incurred on appeal.

I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Houghland Farms, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bream v. BenscoterIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roesch v. KlemannIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Krystal M. Kinghorn v. Kelly N. Clay and BRP, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. BujakIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Crow v. Penrose-St. Francis Healthcare SystemColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company v. BradleyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API