Legal Opinion

Krystal M. Kinghorn v. Kelly N. Clay and BRP, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2012No. 38109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Krystal Kinghorn (Kinghorn) and Kelly Clay (Clay) agreed that Clay would co-sign for a loan for Kinghorn’s benefit. In order to protect Clay in the event that Kinghorn defaulted on the loan, Kinghorn agreed to execute a quitclaim deed to real property that Clay could record if Kinghorn defaulted. When Kinghorn defaulted, Clay recorded the deed and conveyed the property to BRP Incorporated (BRP). Kinghorn filed suit, and the district court unwound the conveyance, holding at summary judgment that the deed was a mortgage and that Kinghorn had a right to redeem the property. BRP…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. Village of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Roosma v. MootsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State, Dept. of Health & Welfare v. HouselIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jones Gledhill Fuhrman GourleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  2. IDHW v. Jane DoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Michael Von JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2022
  4. Paul Driggers v. Karen VassalloIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API