State v. Peplinski
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
Defendant, by his first assignment of error, challenges the imposition of the death penalty on two grounds. He first argues that the death penalty cannot be imposed because the evidence discloses neither an intent to rob or murder deceased nor any overt act on his part from which such an intent can be inferred. We disagree.
“Any murder . . . which shall be committed in the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any . . . robbery . . . shall be deemed to be murder in the first degree and shall be punished with death.” G.S. 14-17. It is not necessary to support a conviction of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.