Legal Opinion

Page v. Ford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1859PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Steuben Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Page, as assignee of one Armstrong, brought suit on notes, and to foreclose a mortgage, &c. The complaint was in the usual form.

The defendants answered, and set up a counterclaim, admitting the execution of the notes and mortgage; that the same were held by Page, as assignee, and had not been paid, but averring that they were given to secure the payment of the balance of the price of a steam engine and boiler, which, by agreement, Armstrong, Drake Co. manufactured for the defendants, to be used in a saw-mill of defendants, of which the makers had knowledge, and made them expressly for that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Driggs v. DwightNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Millett v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  4. Freeman v. CluteNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Dewint v. WiltseNew York Supreme Court · 1832

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Booher v. GoldsboroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API