Legal Opinion
Smith v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 27, 1996No. Civil Action No. G-95-678PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KENT, District Judge.
• The Plaintiff brought this action after he was injured when the cab of the crane he was operating became disengaged from its pedestal mounts. Now pending before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Defendant to respond to certain Interrogatories and Requests for Production. For the reasons, set forth below, the Motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.1
The discovery requests involved in this dispute seek information about statements taken from witnesses, investigative reports compiled by or on behalf of the Defendant, and surveillance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Arnold v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- CREST INFINITI, II, LP v. SwintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Fletcher v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.