Legal Opinion
Fletcher v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 5, 2000No. CIV. 98CV2254E(RBB)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF SURVEILLANCE MATERIALS
BROOKS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On April 24, 2000, this Court heard oral arguments on Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application to Compel Production of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Surveillance Materials. Thomas Peters of Fogel, Feld-man, Ostrov, Ringler & Elevens, appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Mark Fletcher. Nancy Carman appeared on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.
This is the third hearing on Plaintiffs efforts to obtain attorney work product from this Defendant. After…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Martin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Martensen v. KochDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.