Legal Opinion

City of Meadville v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

This appeal presents the issue of whether The PMA Group, employer’s workers’ compensation carrier, is entitled to subrogate against uninsured/underin-sured motor vehicle funds paid to the injured employee pursuant to a motor vehicle insurance policy maintained by the employer through Penn National Insurance Company. The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) concluded that PMA was not entitled to subrogation and reversed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). We reverse.

The underlying facts are undisputed. Edward Kightlinger, a City of Meadville…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dale Manufacturing Co. v. BressiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. Joseph N. DibartoloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Gardner v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Standish v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heller v. Pennsylvania League of Cities & MunicipalitiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Hannigan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Safe Auto Insurance v. School District of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Dillow v. Myers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County2003
  5. Hannigan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API