Dillow v. Myers

NANOVIC, J.,

Before us is defendants’ motion in limine asking that plaintiff be precluded from introducing evidence of his medical expenses and lost wages to the extent the same have been paid by his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier. In addition, defendants ask that plaintiff be precluded from introducing evidence of any wage loss claim to the extent plaintiff’s first-party wage loss coverage under his personal automobile insurance policy provided coverage for such loss.

FACTS

The facts are not in dispute. (See defendants’ motion in limine and plaintiff’s answer, ¶¶1-13 inclusive.) On…