Legal Opinion

Lefebvre v. Zarka

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 26, 2008No. AC 28374PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The plaintiff, Philip E. Lefebvre, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of motions for summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Joni Zarka, Alexander Zarka and Adriana Almada. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motions for summary judgment because disputed issues of material fact exist. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are undisputed and relevant to the claims on appeal. On November 22, 2001, Almada and Alexander Zarka, at the time, ages thirteen and eleven,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McHale v. W.B.S. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Zenik v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Reardon v. Windswept Farm, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mott v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Gonzalez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Giannamore v. ShevchukConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB v. ToczekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API