Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Springer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1930No. 22031. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

This is the second appeal in this case, the first being reported in 150 Wash. 510, 273 Pac. 533.

The respondent, A. J. Mahan, contracted with the appellant O. H. Springer to erect for him a building in Longview, Washington. The contract price of the building was $40,510. After the building was erected, this action was brought to recover damages for failure to comply with the plans and specifications. The defects complained of were, generally, that the concrete in the building had not been properly mixed; that the waterproofing provided for in the plans and specifica tions had not been applied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Woodruff v. Imperial Fire Insurance Co. of London, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Tebbetts v. HaskinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1839
  4. Mahan v. SpringerWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Amann v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Bernbaum v. HodgesWashington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API