Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 22, 1969No. 59-40428-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

Appellant Palmer and Donald McKenzie were jointly charged with second degree burglary. McKenzie pleaded guilty. Palmer, waiving a jury, was tried by the court, convicted, and sentenced. He appeals.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence exhibit 5 (consisting of nine bottles of drugs, syringes, and hypodermic needles) because of insufficient evidence that these items came from the burglarized drugstore. We disagree. The items in exhibit 5 were found in a canvas bag 1 along with burglar tools near a 2-foot by 1%-foot hole in the store roof. The drug store pharmacist…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. AikenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. McDanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. DingesWashington Supreme Court · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MelroseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. State v. RennebergWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. TikkaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. State v. TrasvinaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. State v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API