Legal Opinion

Castillo-Fuentes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1986No. 502-83PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.02. The jury assessed punishment at thirty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. On appeal to the San Antonio Court of Appeals, appellant’s conviction was reversed in an unpublished opinion. Castillo-Fuentes v. State (Tex.App. — San Antonio, No. 04-82-00547-CR, delivered May 25, 1983). We granted the State’s *560petition for discretionary review in order to consider the court of appeals’ holding that there was fundamental error in the jury charge.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Cobarrubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  5. Davis v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API