Legal Opinion
Doe v. Schachter
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 22, 1992No. C-92-2481 MHPPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an employee of a defense contractor, filed this action against the Department of Defense (“DOD”) seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against revocation of his security clearance. Defendants move to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). After carefully considering the parties’ submissions and arguments, the court enters the following order and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Espinosa v. DeVastoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- China National Metal Products Import/Export Co. v. Apex Digital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Mangino v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
- Anchorage v. Integrated Concepts & Research Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.