Legal Opinion

Anchorage v. Integrated Concepts & Research Corp.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided March 4, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-00063-SLGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge.

Before the Court at Docket 12 is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Integrated Concepts and Research Corporation (“ICRC”) on April 17, 2013. At Docket 14, Defendant PND Engineers, *1004Inc. (“PND”) joined the motion. Plaintiff Municipality of Anchorage (“MOA”) opposed the motion, and ICRC timely replied.1 On January 6, 2014, a few days before oral argument was scheduled, at Docket 70, Defendant CH2M Hill Alaska, Inc. (formerly known as VECO Alaska, Inc., and referred to within this Order as <fVECO”) also joined ICRC’s motion to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grueter v. Witherspoon Brajcich McPhee PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024
  2. Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Associates, LTD.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API