Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur Maez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1989No. 88-1128PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.

Defendant Maez (Maez) was charged with armed bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d) (1982) and aiding and abetting, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982). He filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his home and truck and incriminating statements he made thereafter. That motion was denied after a suppression hearing and the evidence was admitted at trial. Maez was convicted. He appeals, arguing that the motion to suppress should have been granted.

The paramount question presented is whether a violation of Payton v. New York, 445…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. Sharrar v. FelsingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Manuel Melendez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Edelmiro Augustin FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Dennis Dayton HoltCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API