United States v. Arthur Maez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
Defendant Maez (Maez) was charged with armed bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d) (1982) and aiding and abetting, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982). He filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his home and truck and incriminating statements he made thereafter. That motion was denied after a suppression hearing and the evidence was admitted at trial. Maez was convicted. He appeals, arguing that the motion to suppress should have been granted.
The paramount question presented is whether a violation of Payton v. New York, 445…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Sharrar v. FelsingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Manuel Melendez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Edelmiro Augustin FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Dennis Dayton HoltCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.