Legal Opinion

United States v. Dennis Dayton Holt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2001No. 99-7150PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM *

After a divided panel affirmed the district court’s suppression of evidence obtained during a search of the defendant’s car incident to a traffic stop, see United States v. Holt, 229 F.3d 931 (10th Cir.2000), this court granted rehearing en banc on the following questions: (1) whether the Fourth Amendment constrains the scope, as well as the duration, of a traffic stop, and (2) whether an officer conducting a traffic stop may ask the driver about the presence of weapons in the absence of reasonable suspicion that the driver is armed and dangerous. Consistent…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. Tommie T. ChildsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. BrighamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Thomas v. DurastantiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API