Gould v. Cornelius Company
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
In this action the Plaintiff has moved the Court for an Order allowing the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Incorporated, hereafter called Pepsi-Cola, to be added as a party defendant. It is alleged that Pepsi-Cola is an Oklahoma Corporation and resides in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The grounds for the joinder repose in the deposition of Mr. Gene Patterson, sales and service representative of Defendant, The Cornelius Company, wherein it is alleged that Pepsi-Cola has purchased the accused infringing product from the Defendant, The Cornelius Company. By…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hydro-Clear Corp. v. Aer-O-Flo Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
- T. P. Laboratories, Inc. v. Ormco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Nopco Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
- Botvin v. Okiebug Distributing Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1974