Legal Opinion

Tully v. Howard

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 31, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

It seems to be generally accepted that the one and only application which may be made for a bill of particulars is within twenty days after the service of the pleading to which the application is directed and that particularly no application is permitted, as to the complaint, after issue joined.

According to Moore’s Federal Practice, page 654, Rule 12 (e) was designed to avoid any distinction between a motion for a more definite statement or for a bill of particulars and this seems to be borne out by the sentence in the Rule, which reads: “The motion shall point out the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  3. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
  4. Mitchell v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
  5. Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API