Legal Opinion

Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H & Co. Kg.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 9, 2002No. 01-1043PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Chief Judge.

Cambridge Literary Properties Ltd. (“Cambridge”) brought this suit against W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H & Co. Kg. (“Goebel”), a German limited partnership, and others associated with it. 1 The complaint sought a share in the profits gained by defendants from the use of images taken from the Hummel Book in which Cambridge claims a copyright interest. The district court granted defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion and dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. We describe the underlying events in the light most favorable to Cambridge as the non-moving party.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Harlow v. Children's HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Platten v. HG Bermuda Exempted Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Adelson v. HananelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Pettengill v. CurtisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API