Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.M.B.H. & Co. Kg.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
The district court entered summary judgment for defendants due to plaintiffs failure to meet the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations in this dispute over profits from the sale of Hummel figurines and images. Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & Co. Kg. (Cambridge II), 448 F.Supp.2d 244 (D.Mass.2006). We affirm.
The key facts are set forth here and in our earlier opinion on a different issue in this case. Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik G.m.b.H. & Co. Kg. (Cambridge I), 295 F.3d 59, 61-62…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cape Ann Investors v. LeponeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- James B. Royal v. Leading Edge Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Neil Gaiman and Marvels and Miracles, Llc, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Todd McFarlane Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Warren Freedenfeld Associates, Inc. v. McTigueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Peter Brownstein v. Tina LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Greene v. General Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Severe Records, LLC v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Isaac Donald Everly v. Patrice EverlyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.