Legal Opinion
Adelson v. Hananel
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 13, 2011No. 09-2231PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellee Sheldon Adelson brought this declaratory action to determine rights under an oral contract that he had negotiated with appellant Moshe Hananel. In the district court Hananel argued that the agreement, pursuant to which he was employed by a company owned by Adelson, entitled him to obtain a twelve percent investment in Adelson’s casino venture in Macau. Adelson claimed that their agreement was not so broad as to contemplate the Macau investment option. Rather, the contract limited Hananel to reaping twelve percent of net profits from high-tech sector investments…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- A Corp. v. All American Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- C.W. Downer & Company v. Bioriginal Food & Science CorpCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- PREP Tours Inc. v. American Youth Soccer Org.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- 4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. New York & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Carreras v. PMG COLLINS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.