Lehto v. Sproul
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a litigant, after a final judgment on the merits of a contractual claim against the defendant, is barred by the principles of res judicata from thereafter pursuing a second cause of action, stemming from the same set of facts, against the same defendant. The present cause of action is in two counts, quantum meruit and implied contract. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant requested and was provided extra materials and labor which were not included in a written construction contract. That contract was the basis of an earlier suit by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (83-De)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Duhaime v. American Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- North Park Mortgage Services, Inc. v. PinetteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Stein v. HortonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Vakalis v. KaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.