Legal Opinion

Borders v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1992No. 070-92PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant pled not guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and was tried before the court. The trial judge found Appellant guilty and assessed punishment at twenty years in the penitentiary and a $600 fine. The conviction was affirmed. Borders v. State, 822 S.W.2d 661 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991). We granted discretionary review to determine whether Appellant preserved error by his motion for new trial concerning his right to present evidence on the issue of punishment prior to the trial court’s assessment of punishment. We will…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Issa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Borders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Ditto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  4. Cole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  5. Clewis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API