Legal Opinion
Borders v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 4, 1992No. 05-90-01173-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHITHAM, Justice.
Appellant, Louis T. Borders, appeals a conviction for unlawful delivery of cocaine. We find no merit in any of appellant’s seven points of error. Accordingly, we affirm.
In his first point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a new trial because the auxiliary court/drug court that heard the trial of appellant did not have criminal jurisdiction under article 4.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. We begin by noting that the forum description used by appellant “the auxiliary court/ drug court” is but an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Clewis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Prieto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Choice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Chad Allen Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.