Legal Opinion

Ditto v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1999No. 1617-97, 1618-97PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERS, J.,

delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.

Appellant Anthony Ray Ditto was charged with indecency with a child. In an unrelated case, appellant Lemar Ervin was charged with sexual assault. These cases have been consolidated because they present similar issues. 1

I

Pursuant to nearly identical plea bargains, appellants agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the State’s recommendation that the punishment not exceed ten years confinement. Appellants also both filed applications for probation. In Ditto’s plea bargain, the State noted it had “no recommendation on the Defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Issa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Borders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Ervin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Shankle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Ex Parte HuskinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Perdue v. Patten Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  4. Von Schounmacher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API