Legal Opinion

Osrowitz v. Market Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1940No. Civ. 11055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries sustained in falling through an open freight elevator shaft on the sidewalk in front of the premises owned and operated by the defendants. He recovered a judgment in the sum of $8,500. The defendants have appealed.

The accident happened at about 3:45 o’clock P. M. on January 20, 1938, a very sunny day, in front of the premises known as 739 Market Street. That street runs east and west. A double set of street car tracks are located therein. Grant Avenue extends from the north and terminates in Market Street. Commencing with practically the east…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Stanhope v. Los Angeles College of ChiropracticCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Power v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API