People v. Tigre
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated February 27, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In establishing a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act, the People bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the determinations sought (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 117-118 [2011]). “In assessing points,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. LuciusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. LoweryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. EasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. Claros-ZelayandiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023