Legal Opinion

People v. Tigre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2015No. 2015-02433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated February 27, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In establishing a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act, the People bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the determinations sought (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 117-118 [2011]). “In assessing points,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. FinizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. LuciusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LoweryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. EasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. People v. Claros-ZelayandiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API