Legal Opinion

Buravski v. DiMeola

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 14, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.

In this action for wrongful death the defendant had a verdict. From the judgment rendered thereon the plaintiff has appealed, assigning as the only grounds of error certain rulings on evidence.

The plaintiff, administrator of the estate of his wife, Shirley BuraVski, claimed to have proved the following facts: During the night of December 27, 1950, Mrs. Buravsld, hereinafter referred to as the decedent, occupied for hire a cabin at Homeacres Cabins, owned and controlled by the defendant and located in Milford. The cabin was provided with an oil burning heater vented to the outside air. In the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borucki v. MacKenzie Brothers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Fahey v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Gonchar v. KelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Atlas Realty Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Eamiello v. PiscitelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. City of Claremont v. TruellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Hall v. MertzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Boston Educational Research Co. v. American MacHine & Foundry Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
  5. Boston Educational Research Company, Inc. v. American MacHine & Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API