Beeler v. Barr
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Cowlitz county, Darch, J., entered April 27, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action upon a promissory note, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellant, as administrator of the estate of Acteson, sued upon a promissory note to recover $400 and interest, attorney’s fees, and costs. The defense was payment. Upon these issues, after trial to the court without a jury, findings of fact sustaining the defense of payment were made, and a conclusion of law and judgment in favor of respondent followed accordingly. No exceptions were taken *259or filed as required by law. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 382 (P. C. 81 §671).
There is no contention, nor could there be any tenable contention, that the conclusion of law and judgment do not necessarily and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Fender v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Yakima Grocery Co. v. BenoitWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Meacham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Seattle Automobile Co. v. StimsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beauregard v. Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Hatch v. Hover-Schiffner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- James v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Pearson v. M. Gottstein Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920